If long and empty articles are no good, are short and empty ones any better? They are no good either. We should forbid all empty talk. But the essay first and foremost task is to throw the long, smelly foot-bindings of the slattern into the dustbin. Some may ask, "Isn't Capital very long? What are we to do about that?" The answer is simple, just go on reading. There is a proverb, "Sing different songs on different mountains another runs, "Fit the appetite to the dishes and the dress to the figure". Whatever we do must be done according to actual circumstances, and it is the same with writing articles and making speeches.
Had any of our gentlemen written that speech, just imagine! It would have run to tens of thousands of words at a minimum. We are in the midst of a war, and we should learn how to write shorter and pithier articles. Although there is as yet no fighting here in Yenan, our troops at the front are daily engaged in battle, and the people in the rear are busy at work. If articles are too long, who will read them? Some comrades at the front, too, like to write long reports. They take pains over writing them and send them here for us to read. But who has the hardihood to read them?
Essay structure - harvard Writing Center - harvard University
If we reason earnestly and properly, it will be effective. The first thing to do in this reasoning process is to give the patient a holiday good shake-up by shouting at him, "you are ill!" so as to administer a shock and make him break out in a sweat, and then to give him sincere advice. Let us now analyse stereotyped Party writing and see where its evils lie. Using poison as an antidote to poison, we shall imitate the form of the stereotyped eight-section essay and set forth the following "eight legs which might be called the eight major indictments. The first indictment against stereotyped Party writing is that it fills endless pages with empty verbiage.
Some of our comrades love to write long articles with no substance, very much like the "foot-bindings of a slattern, long as well as smelly". Why must they write such long and empty articles? There can be only one explanation; they are determined the masses shall not read them. Because the articles are long and empty, the masses shake their heads at the very sight of them. How can they be expected to read them? Such writings are good for nothing except to bluff the naive, among whom they spread bad influences and foster bad habits. On June 22 last year the soviet Union began waging a gigantic war against aggression, and yet Stalin's speech on July 3 was only the length of an editorial in our Liberation daily.
But within the communist Party too the situation was not uniform; there, too, some members deviated and, lacking a firm grasp of Marxism, committed errors of formalism, namely, the errors of subjectivism, sectarianism and stereotyped Party writing. This was the development of formalism towards the "Left". So it can be seen that stereotyped Party writing is no accident, but is, on the one hand, a reaction to the positive elements of the may 4th movement and, on the other, a legacy, a continuation or development of its negative elements. It is useful for us to understand this point. Just as it was revolutionary and necessary to fight the old stereotyped writing and the old dogmatism during the period of the may 4th movement, so it is revolutionary and necessary today for us to use marxism to criticize the new stereotyped writing and the. If there had been no fight against the old stereotype and the old dogmatism during the may 4th period, the minds of the Chinese people would not have been freed from bondage to them, and China would have no hope of freedom and independence.
This task was merely begun in the period of the may 4th movement, and a very great effort-a huge job of work on the road of revolutionary remoulding-is still necessary to enable the whole people to free themselves completely from the domination of the old. If today we do not oppose the new stereotyped writing and the new dogmatism, the minds of the Chinese people will be fettered by formalism of another kind. If we do not get rid of the poison of stereotyped Party writing and the error of dogmatism found among a section (only a section, of course) of Party comrades, then it will be impossible to arouse a vigorous and lively revolutionary spirit, to eradicate. Subjectivism, sectarianism and stereotyped Party writing-all three are anti-marxist and meet the needs not of the proletariat but of the exploiting classes. They are a reflection of petty-bourgeois ideology in our Party. China is a country with a very large petty bourgeoisie and our Party is surrounded by this enormous class; a great number of our Party members come from this class, and when they join the party they inevitably drag in with them a petty-bourgeois tail. Unless checked and transformed, the fanaticism and one-sidedness of petty-bourgeois revolutionaries can easily engender subjectivism and sectarianism, of which foreign stereotyped writing, or stereotyped Party writing, is one form of expression. It is not easy to clean out these things and sweep them away. It must be done properly, that is, by taking pains to reason with people.
How to write better essays: nobody does introductions properly
The may 4th movement, however, had its own weaknesses. Many of the leaders lacked the critical spirit of Marxism, and the method they used was generally that of the bourgeoisie, that is, the formalist method. They were quite right in opposing the old stereotype and the old dogma and in advocating science and democracy. But in dealing with current conditions, with history, and with things foreign, they lacked the critical spirit of historical materialism and regarded what was bad as absolutely and wholly bad and what was good as absolutely and wholly good. This formalist approach to problems affected the subsequent course of the movement. In its development, the may 4th movement divided into two currents. One section inherited its scientific and democratic spirit and transformed it on the basis of Marxism; this is what the communists and some non-Party marxists did. Another section took the road of the bourgeoisie; this was the development of formalism towards the right.
Another great and related achievement was its fight against imperialism, but the struggle against the old stereotype and the old dogma remains one of the great achievements of the may 4th movement. Later on, however, foreign stereotyped writing national and foreign dogma came into being. Running counter to marxism, certain people in our Party developed the foreign stereotype and dogma into subjectivism, sectarianism and stereotyped Party writing. These are the new stereotype and the new dogma. They have become so deeply ingrained in the minds of many comrades that today we still have a very strenuous job of remoulding. Thus we see that the lively, vigorous, progressive and revolutionary movement of the may 4th period which fought the old feudal stereotyped writing and dogma was later turned by some people into its very opposite, giving rise to the new stereotyped writing and dogma. The latter are not lively and vigorous but dead and stiff, not progressive but retrogressive, not revolutionary but obstacles to revolution. That is to say, the foreign stereotyped writing, or stereotyped Party writing, is a reaction to the original nature of the may 4th movement.
the use of the classical Chinese language and advocated vernacular Chinese, opposed the traditional dogmas and advocated science and democracy, all of which was quite right. The movement then was vigorous and lively, progressive and revolutionary. In those days the ruling classes indoctrinated students with. Confucian teachings and compelled the people to venerate all the trappings of Confucianism as religious dogma, and all writers used the classical language. In short, what was written and taught by the ruling classes and their hangers-on was in the nature of stereotyped writing and dogma, both in content and in form. That was the old stereotype and the old dogma. A tremendous achievement of the may 4th movement was its public exposure of the ugliness of the old stereotype and the old dogma and its call to the people to rise against them.
And those who produce stereotyped Party writing always seek large audiences. Thus it has become imperative to expose and destroy. Stereotyped Party writing is, moreover, one brand of the "foreign stereotype which was attacked by lu hsun a long time ago. 2, why then do we call it the party "eight-legged essay"? Because, besides its foreign flavour, it has some smell of native soil. Perhaps it too can be counted as creative work of a sort! Who says our people have not produced any creative works?
Writing a three-paragraph Essay - cite this for me free reference
Oppose stereotyped party writing, selected Works of mao tse-tung, february 8, 1942. Comrade kai-feng has just stated the purpose of today's meeting. I now want to discuss the ways subjectivism and sectarianism use stereotyped Party writing (or the party "eight-legged essay 1 as their instrument of propaganda or form of expression. We are fighting against subjectivism and sectarianism, but they will still have writing a hiding-place to lurk in if at the same time we do not get rid of stereotyped Party writing. If we destroy that too, we shall "checkmate" subjectivism and sectarianism and make both these monsters show themselves in their true colours, and then we shall easily be able to annihilate them, like "rats running across the street with everyone yelling: Kill them! It does not matter much if a person produces stereotyped Party writings only for himself to read. If he passes them on to someone else, the number of readers is doubled, and already no small harm is done. If he has them posted up, mimeographed, printed in newspapers or published in book form, then the problem becomes indeed a big one, for they can influence many people.